Bisociation, Bugs, and Boredom: Why AI Optimization Limits Consumer Joy

By all accounts, industry knowledge dictates a rigid path to success: Do this to win. Avoid that to dodge failure. A foundational rule across the digital landscape is simple: never, under any circumstances, release a product riddled with bugs.

But what if the bug is exactly what creates the joy?

The importance of failure in the creative process has long been celebrated. A stray, "wrong" marking on a sketch pad completely redefines the perspective of a drawing. A meaningless, accidental sound in a recording studio becomes the foundational hook of a hit song. A background character in one narrative arc shows enough quirky friction to become the star of their own spin-off show.

True creativity is the skill of seeing potential in a weakness and redefining it as a strength. It is about understanding that sometimes, a structural failure is simply a new solution waiting to be recognized.

The Art of Bisociation and Accidental Delight

In his seminal book The Act of Creation, Arthur Koestler refers to this phenomenon as bisociation—the sudden, unexpected interlocking of two previously unrelated frames of reference. Often, a technical "failure" provides that jarring second frame, violently forcing the creative mind out of its established rut.

This is how we capture accidental delight within the mundane. Consider the creation of the iconic Gorillaz track, "DARE." While setting up levels in the studio, Manchester musician Shaun Ryder blurted out a gravelly phrase to check his microphone volume. Producer Damon Albarn heard the raw, unpolished glitch in the room and instantly realized it was the track's definitive hook: “It’s coming up. It’s coming up. It’s coming up. It’s dare.” What was meant to be a boring background test became a global anthem.

When is a Product Truly "Ready"?

Many companies push products out the door long before they are functionally viable. I have witnessed this firsthand in my career: a business rushing a messy, broken product to market, completely destroying its brand equity and ultimately rendering it the final thing they ever manufactured.

Traditionally, we consider a digital product "ready for release" when the code is stable, the marketing engine is primed, and the assets are polished. But gauging whether a product is emotionally ready is a far more elusive task. By building an experience that is clinically complete, we might actually be limiting the capacity for human joy.

This paradox was vividly on display in a recent YouTube stream by Vinesauce of an early release of the Electronic Arts’ game, skate. The game was in an unpolished, early development phase, and the stream is a chaotic montage of broken physics engines, glitching character models, and environments folding in on themselves. It is hilarious. Do yourself a joy filled favour and watch it. It is a pure, unadulterated euphoria of the gamer reacting to these systemic failures is a refreshing delight. They weren’t angry that the software had broken; they were ecstatic. The game's mechanical failure created a hilarious, shared human spectacle that a perfectly optimized, bug-free release could never replicate.

The Serendipity Limit of Artificial Intelligence

This reveals a profound limitation in our current rush toward hyper-automation and automated engineering.

An Artificial Intelligence can be trained to optimize a user interface to a flawless degree. It can eliminate latency, predict user paths, and iron out every single wrinkle of friction in a system. But because AI operates strictly within the boundaries of statistical probability and data parameters, it is fundamentally incapable of serendipity.

An AI cannot laugh at a glitch. It cannot see the artistic potential in a broken physics loop, nor can it intentionally manufacture the beautiful absurdity of a character model accidentally launching into space.

When we design digital lifecycles purely to eliminate failure, we create efficient, sterile environments. The joyous chaos of skate. reminds us that human satisfaction isn't always found in seamless consumption. Sometimes, the best part of an experience is the moment the machine breaks, leaving us to find meaning and comedy in the wreckage.

Joe Macleod

Joe Macleod is founder of the worlds first customer ending business. A veteran of product development industry with decades of experience across service, digital and product sectors.

Head of Endineering at AndEnd. TEDx Speaker. Wired says “An energetic Englishman, Macleod advises companies on how to game out their endgames. Every product faces a cycle of endings. It's important to plan for each of them. Not all companies do." Fast Company says “Joe Macleod wants brands to focus on what happens to products at the end of their life cycle—not just for the environment but for the entire consumer experience.”

He is author of the Ends book, that iFixIt called “the best book about consumer e-waste”. And the new book –Endineering, that people are saying “defines and maps out a whole new sub-discipline of study”. The DoLectures consider the Endineering book one of the best business books of 2022.

https://www.andend.co
Next
Next

Claude Mythos introduces Crack of Doubt for banking customers